The engagement crisis

Employee Engagement: The Cultural Dividend of Trust and Respect

The Engagement Crisis

Employee engagement is at historically low levels. Global surveys consistently show engagement levels hovering around 23% with Europe being at the bottom with only 13%.

The consequences are severe: diminished productivity, higher turnover, and a loss of innovation capacity. Yet despite the urgency, many organizations continue to misinterpret engagement as something that can be engineered through metrics or perks.

Engagement Is Not Infrastructure

Engagement is not a system to be installed, nor is it a competency to be trained. It is the result of a thoughtfully created and actively managed culture. When organizations build environments that prioritize trust, respect, and empowerment, engagement emerges naturally. It cannot be mandated, gamified, or reduced to a dashboard metric.

The KPI Illusion

Performance management is predominantly concentrated on KPIs and targets. While these measure compliance, they never measure true performance.

  • KPIs encourage box-ticking rather than breakthrough thinking.
  • Targets drive short-term behaviors at the expense of long-term growth.
  • Metrics strip human contribution down to numbers, eroding meaning and motivation.

The result is predictable: disengagement. Employees don’t rally around compliance, they rally around purpose, respect, and the opportunity to contribute meaningfully.

Engagement as a Cultural Outcome

Engagement flourishes when performance management systems value competency, improvement, and innovation. This requires leaders to:

  • Redefine performance as growth and contribution, not compliance.
  • Build trust through transparency and consistency.
  • Empower employees to take ownership of their work.
  • Respect individuality while fostering collaboration.

When these elements are enabled through a requisite culture, engagement becomes the natural byproduct.

The Leadership Imperative

Leaders must stop asking, “How do we increase engagement scores?” and start asking,
“How do we create a culture where engagement thrives?”
The difference is profound. Engagement is not a target to chase, it is the dividend of a solid managed culture, trust-driven leadership, and performance systems that honor human potential.

The Payoff

Organizations that embrace this shift see:

  • Higher retention and reduced turnover costs
  • Greater innovation and adaptability
  • Stronger collaboration and resilience
  • Sustainable performance that outlasts market cycles

Conclusion: Engagement as Culture’s Reflection

Employee engagement is not infrastructure, nor a competency to be trained. It is the mirror of culture. When trust, respect, and empowerment are woven into the fabric of organizational life, and when performance management values competency, improvement, and innovation, engagement follows.

The lesson is clear: stop chasing engagement as a metric. Start building the culture that makes it inevitable.